Luke Heath Milsom
P.h.D. candidate in Economics at the University of Oxford.
I will be joining the department of economics at KU Leuven as an Assistant Professor in 2024 after spending a year as a Postdoctoral Fellow at the IFS.
I work on questions in urban and spatial economics/ international trade, development economics, and public economics.
In this paper, I quantify and study the consequences of, spatial inequality of opportunity in Benin, Cameroon, and Mali. To do this, I first estimate the causal effect of growing up in each locality in each year on the probability a child completes primary education, using a movers design. On average, moving to a one standard deviation better location at birth increases a child’s probability of completing primary school by 15.0 percentage points, but the extent to which place matters varies over countries and spatial differences don’t attenuate over time. Place matters more for girls than boys and whereas urbanization and access to electricity are associated with greater gender inequality of opportunity, employment in agriculture has the opposite effect. Finally, I show that there is a negative relationship between regional inequality of opportunity and aggregate development, implying that there are potential welfare gains from equalizing opportunity.
Spatial inequality within countries is a pervasive and persistent phenomenon. How does the connectivity of place determine underlying spatial inequality of opportunity? To answer this question, I derive a sufficient statistic result linking local opportunity to market access terms, developing a framework consistent with a broad class of spatial general equilibrium models. I empirically validate this result using a novel not-on-least-cost-path identification strategy and data from historical road maps in Benin, Cameroon, and Mali covering 1970 to 2020, that I digitize. Using these estimates to parameterize a structural case of the spatial model, I show that road building alters the spatial distribution of opportunity. By considering each possible road upgrade I show that although some roads decrease the standard deviation of opportunity by more than 2%, others increase inequality by a similar amount. By fixing the spatial distribution of opportunity I show that to achieve similar reductions in inequality by moving people, a prohibitively large number would need to migrate from low- to high-opportunity areas - between 13% and 44% of the low-opportunity areas' population. Policymakers also face an equity-efficiency trade-off: 4 out of the top 10 aggregate opportunity-increasing roads also increase spatial inequality of opportunity.
(2023) RIEF conference (awarded best article prize, joint with Lea Bou Sleiman), Brussels (2022) LEAP, Bocconi; EWMES, Berlin; NEUDC, Yale; CEP Junior trade workshop, LSE; OxDev, Oxford; American Urban Economics Association Summer Meeting, World Bank DC; Infra4Dev (World bank/ IGC), online; 7th Lindau Meeting on Economic Sciences, Lindau; Development Economics Workshop, ARE UC Berkeley; European Urban Economics Association Meeting, LSE; Royal Economic Society Young Economist Symposium, Online; African Meeting of the Econometric Society, Online; Warwick Ph.D. conference, Warwick; Applied Microeconomics Workshop, Oxford; (2021) CSAE Conference, Oxford; Development Economics Workshop, Oxford; Newcastle Ph.D. Economics Conference, Newcastle; (2020) American Urban Economics Association Workshop, Online; (2019) Applied Microeconomics Workshop, National University of Singapore; CSAE Conference, Oxford.
The Butcher, the Brewer, or the Baker: The Role of Occupations in Explaining Wage Inequality.
With Shihang HouWorking Paper
Google does not pay its canteen chefs the same premium as it does its software engineers; there is heterogeneity in pay premia within a firm. To study the implications of this observation, we estimate a two-way, worker-job, fixed effect model that builds upon the canonical model by Abowd et al. (1999) by allowing for within-firm heterogeneity. Estimating our model on UK administrative data, we find that even if workers, and firms, were identical, 25% of current log-wage variance would remain, due solely to heterogeneity between occupations. We further document that worker heterogeneity accounts for a relatively small proportion of log-wage variance, and that between-firm pay heterogeneity is more important in higher-wage occupations and larger labour markets.
Minimum Wages and the China Syndrome: Causal Evidence from US Local Labour Markets.
With Isabelle RolandWorking Paper
Exposure to Chinese import competition led to significant manufacturing job losses in the United States. Local labor markets, however, differ significantly in how they fared with respect to manufacturing employment. An important question is whether labor market institutions have an impact on the dynamic response of manufacturing employment to rising import penetration. We contribute to this debate by showing that minimum wages amplified the negative effect of Chinese import penetration on manufacturing employment in US local labor markets between 2000 and 2007. We develop a rigorous double-edged identification strategy. First, we construct shift-share instrumental variables to address the endogeneity of import penetration. Second, we use a border identification strategy to distinguish the effects of minimum wage policies from the effects of other local labor market characteristics that are unrelated to policy. Specifically, we rely on comparing commuting zones that are contiguous to each other but located in different states with different minimum wage policies. The approach essentially considers what happens to the response of manufacturing employment to import penetration when one crosses a policy border.
The gravity of syndication ties in international equity underwriting
With Vladimir Pazitka, Isabelle Roland, and Dariusz Wojcik.Working Paper
We examine how cross-border syndication ties reduce information frictions and positively impact exports of equity underwriting services. Using a panel data set from 2000–15, we develop a measure of information flows based on ‘core syndication ties’ where the lead underwriter is in either the importing or exporting country. We find that new core syndication ties have a significant and positive effect on exports. This finding is supported by evidence from ‘peripheral syndication ties’, which are associated with smaller information flows, and an instrumental variable approach which focuses on plausibly exogenous supply-side shocks. Furthermore, the effect of new core syndication ties is stronger when information frictions between trading partners are more severe and for more information-sensitive transactions like IPOs.
Work in Progress
Moving to Possibility. Migration and Deviations from Expected Utility in Spatial Equilibrium.
Labour of Love: Search for Occupational Meaning and Worker Welfare. With Hannah Zillessen, and Shihang Hou.
The Epidemiological Impact of the NHS Covid-19 App.
With Chris Wymant, Luca Ferretti, Daphne Tsallis, Marcos Charalambides, Lucie Abeler-Dörner, David Bonsall, Robert Hinch, Michelle Kendall, Mathew Ayres, Chris Holmes, Mark Briers, Christophe Fraser.Paper, News Coverage, Replication files, Twitter Thread
The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the emergence of digital contact tracing to help to prevent the spread of the disease. A mobile phone app records proximity events between app users, and when a user tests positive for COVID-19, their recent contacts can be notified instantly. Theoretical evidence has supported this new public health intervention, but its epidemiological impact has remained uncertain. Here we investigate the impact of the National Health Service (NHS) COVID-19 app for England and Wales, from its launch on 24 September 2020 to the end of December 2020. It was used regularly by approximately 16.5 million users (28% of the total population), and sent approximately 1.7 million exposure notifications: 4.2 per index case consenting to contact tracing. We estimated that the fraction of individuals notified by the app who subsequently showed symptoms and tested positive (the secondary attack rate (SAR)) was 6%, similar to the SAR for manually traced close contacts. We estimated the number of cases averted by the app using two complementary approaches: modelling based on the notifications and SAR gave an estimate of 284,000 (central 95% range of sensitivity analyses 108,000–450,000), and statistical comparison of matched neighbouring local authorities gave an estimate of 594,000 (95% confidence interval 317,000–914,000). Approximately one case was averted for each case consenting to notification of their contacts. We estimated that for every percentage point increase in app uptake, the number of cases could be reduced by 0.8% (using modelling) or 2.3% (using statistical analysis). These findings support the continued development and deployment of such apps in populations that are awaiting full protection from vaccines.
Epidemiological changes on the Isle of Wight after the launch of the NHS Test and Trace programme: a preliminary analysis.
The Lancet Digital Health, 2020
With Michelle Kendall; Lucie Abeler-Dörner; Chris Wymant; Luca Ferretti; Mark Briers; Chris Holmes; David Bonsall; Johannes Abeler; Christophe Fraser.Paper, Replication files
We observed significant decreases in incidence and R on the Isle of Wight immediately after the launch of the Test and Trace programme. The Isle of Wight had a marked reduction in R, from 1·3 before the Test and Trace programme to 0·5 after by one of our measures, and went from having the third highest R before the Test and Trace programme, to the twelfth lowest afterwards compared with other UTLAs. Our results show that the epidemic on the Isle of Wight was controlled quickly and effectively after the launch of Test and Trace.
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.
JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020
With Samuel Altmann; Hannah Zillessen; Raffaele Blassone; Frederic Gerdon; Ruben Bach; Frauke Kreuter; Daniele Nosenzo; Séverine Toussaert; Johannes Abeler.Paper, Replication files
Epidemiological evidence shows that app-based contact tracing can suppress the spread of COVID-19 if a high enough proportion of the population uses the app and that it can still reduce the number of infections if uptake is moderate. We found strong support for the app under both regimes, in all countries, across all subgroups of the population, and irrespective of regional-level COVID-19 mortality rates. We investigated the main factors that may hinder or facilitate uptake and found that concerns about cybersecurity and privacy, together with a lack of trust in the government, are the main barriers to adoption.